Today I configured a new workflow with the parallel “Bitrise Start Build” (very cool and awaited feature btw thank you). I noticed that my build #1 which starts builds #2 and #3 was lunching itself as well. That lead to have another build #1 starting number #2 and #3 in an inception-like scenario…
I noticed that in the field “Workflows” of my #1’s “Bitrise Start Build” I left an extra trailing blank line:
"#1 #2
"
So… either their is a problem with “Bitrise Start Build” itself or an extra blank line means “start yourself” (which is also a problem right ?)?
Yes as I said, the extra blank line in the field “Workflows” of my “Bitrise Start Build" step caused it. Removing it solved the problem. I’m not too sure I want to reintroduce that line (that I don’t need) it in order to check if that behaviors is still in place ^^ If I find it I’ll communicate you the build number before the extra blank line removal.