Add Support For Bitbucket Build Status

[viktorbenei]

@AlexandruB

but does the service user work for a self hosted bitbucket installation?

OK, just read your question again @AlexandruB - you’re referring to the self-hosted / on-premise Bitbucket Server.

That’s a completely separate system, with its own API, and so the connected service user (which is a Bitbucket.org connection) can not be used for that as it’s incompatible (bitbucket.org and the on-premise Bitbucket Server - formerly Stash - don’t have the same API, there are completely separate services with incompatible APIs).

For the on-premise / self hosted Bitbucket Server please see the related Feature Requests and discussion at:

Build status for Bitbucket Server

Adding built in support for this was mentioned in Send status updates to hosted GitLab instances - #16 by MartinStraub @MartinStraub when we get to work on the built in support (meaning to do it without any Build Step) we’ll definitely support the self-hosted versions of the “big three” (GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab). Might take a bit more time for Bitbucket as the self hosted version of Bitbucket (Bitbucket Server) is quite a bit different compared to bitbucket.org, in fact it wasn’t even calle…